How non-compete agreements work in Mississippi, and what employers and employees should know before signing.
A non-compete contract is an agreement between a worker and an employer that restricts the worker's ability to change jobs. The specifics vary across employers and states, but they all restrict the ability of an employee to compete with a current employer for some specified period of time within a specified geographic area.
Non-compete agreements can promote innovation and allow the employer to recover the costs of worker training. Non-competes paired with non-disclosure language can also protect a company's trade secrets and other proprietary information. At the same time, non-competes can have significant negative implications for worker bargaining power and job mobility, and they can be used to improperly restrict competition.
Similar to non-competes are no-poach agreements and non-solicitation agreements. These are often used between franchisees and franchisors to restrict the ability to hire each other's workers.
While non-competes are more common in certain occupations, such as healthcare, management, computer and mathematical, and architectural and engineering occupations, they are also used across educational, occupational, and income groups. Non-compete restrictions are enforceable not only against workers who voluntarily quit but also against those who are fired.
Mississippi recognizes that an employer has a legitimate interest in the protection of its customer base, its goodwill, and its ability to succeed in a competitive marketplace. Covenants may be used to protect confidential information, trade secrets, proprietary information, vendor relationships, business practices, and the employer's investment in the training and education of an employee.
However, restrictive covenants are not favored in law. The employer has the burden of proving their reasonableness, and the reasonableness as to time and space limitations must be determined from the facts of each case. When considering whether to enforce a covenant not to compete, the court will weigh the rights of the employer, the rights of the employee, and the rights of the public. Enforcement is predicated upon the reasonableness and specificity of the terms, primarily the duration of the restriction and its geographic scope.
Employee departures increase your costs where replacement involves significant time and training. Departures can also affect profitability through the loss of customers and proprietary business information. Employers should carefully craft their employment agreements to protect their interests to the fullest extent the law allows.
Many employers use non-compete contracts that contain unenforceable, overbroad provisions. If successful enforcement is your goal, then you need a properly drafted agreement. Many employers also mistakenly wait until after the employee has accepted employment before asking the employee to sign the non-compete requirement. This arguably puts the employee at an unfair disadvantage, and it leaves open the possibility that a court will find no consideration was paid in return for the restrictions obtained.
You should disclose to potential new hires early on that a job offer will be conditioned on signing a non-compete contract. Any attempt to have an employee sign a non-compete after hiring should be accompanied by the offer of some specific additional consideration.
Non-competes can have a chilling effect on employee mobility because both the employee and a potential employer may fear the potential for litigation. An employee working under a non-compete agreement has less leverage when negotiating for greater compensation.
In our experience, almost everyone who is asked to sign a non-compete does so. Few seek legal counsel or even read the terms before signing, and others are unaware that their employment agreement contains a non-compete provision at all. You should carefully read your employment contract and identify any restrictive provisions. If there is non-compete language, understand how it affects your freedom of movement, evaluate whether you are being adequately compensated for agreeing to any restrictions, and attempt to negotiate better terms before signing.
If you have already signed a non-compete agreement that you believe is overly restrictive, look for opportunities when you have the leverage to renegotiate the terms or eliminate it altogether.
More in Business & Commercial Law
Who Handles This
The fastest way to reach us is by phone, or use the form below.
Get in Touch
OfficeDanks Miller & Cory PA
213 South Lamar Street
Jackson, MS 39201
Phone601-957-3101
En Español601-326-3000 — Sitio en español
Fax601-957-3160
HoursMonday to Thursday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.